The EFL is concerned and disappointed at the position adopted by the Professional Footballers’ Association (PFA), following its decision to issue legal proceedings in respect of the approved changes to the League One Squad Cost Management Protocol.

The changes simply amend an existing framework designed to support responsible cost control and improve financial sustainability across League One.

The proposed changes have been discussed at length through the Professional Football Negotiating and Consultative Committee (PFNCC) process, including with the PFA, and the EFL has taken those discussions into account.

The PFA has argued that the League cannot implement the changes unless there is full agreement through the PFNCC. The League does not accept that the PFA’s position is correct.

This is the second time in just over five years that the PFA has sought to prevent reforms to financial controls in League One.

In February 2021, the PFA successfully argued that the introduction of a salary cap represented such a fundamental change that agreement through the PFNCC was required.

The EFL does not consider the approved changes to the SCMP rules to have the same effect as they do not amount to a major change in the Regulations of the League affecting a player’s terms and conditions of employment.

They are designed to support responsible cost control and improve financial sustainability across League One.

The EFL respects the role of the PFA and recognises the importance of player engagement on matters that affect the professional game.

We remain committed to constructive dialogue. However, the PFA’s decision to oppose these reforms, and to pursue legal action, diverts limited resources and adds further cost to a game already under financial pressure.

League One Clubs have made it clear that change is needed. Costs are rising, losses are increasing and many Clubs are relying more heavily on owner funding to meet their commitments. That model is not sustainable for Clubs, players or the wider game.

The approved changes are intended to support responsible financial management, encourage sensible squad planning and reduce the risk of Clubs spending beyond their means.

This is not about undermining players’ interests. It is about creating a stable environment in which Clubs can meet their obligations and continue to invest in football.

Trevor Birch, EFL Chief Executive, said:

“Financial sustainability and player protection are not competing objectives — they go hand in hand. Put simply, these reforms are designed to make Clubs more sustainable.

“Stable Clubs are better placed to honour contracts, pay wages on time, invest in facilities and create long-term opportunities for players. But a rising tide of losses and growing reliance on owner funding increase risk for everyone.

“That is why delaying reform is a risk. Clubs need rules that help them plan responsibly and avoid spending beyond their means.

“With the Independent Football Regulator now operational, the game needs to show it can take credible action on sustainability itself, rather than wait for solutions to be imposed externally.

“League One and League Two Clubs operate in a very different financial environment from Clubs in the Championship and Premier League. The rules need to reflect that reality. These reforms are about helping Clubs compete responsibly, plan properly and remain sustainable for the communities they represent.”

The EFL will continue to engage constructively with the PFA and other stakeholders. But it cannot ignore the financial pressures facing Clubs or accept further delay when the risks to the game are increasing. Our priority is clear: a fair, competitive and financially sustainable league system that protects Clubs, players, supporters and communities over the long term.

EFL Statement: Professional Footballers' Association

EFL Statement: Professional Footballers' Association